5/16/2023 0 Comments Allstar guideliner![]() ![]() ![]() Guests that register prior to the Gym/Program registration will NOT be linked to your Gym/Program account. Program/Gyms must be registered with accurate rosters for event prior to parents/guest registering for a Guest Account. Perhaps the GMRS nodes could be partitioned or assigned in a way that removes any confusion.GUEST REGISTRATION / TRAVEL PACKAGE INFORMATION Smaller footprint repeaters can be simulcast with RTCM or can be multicast and operated on a cooperatve basis. Why would someone need to do so? The cost of a high altitude repeater site is out of reach these days. Will ASL Board support GMRS systems? Obvioulsy no one is asking to link Part 95 and Part 97, rather support linking of GMRS with ASL. So assuming that there is no FCC ban (to date there have been no FCC NAL actions). So what we do have in the new rules is suggestions that linking by the internet is indeed supported. I questioned this with the FCC during the last rewrite (which took years) and in the end the FCC simply ran out of time. The current rules do have some vestigial scriveners errors resulting from attempts by staff to remove obsolte rules and when doing so, leaving orphaned rules behind. While PSTN interconnection is not permitted, the rules have been relaxed in many areas. However if one reviews the history of the rules there was a ban on linking to the PSTN and this was done to prevent competition to ATT and long distance services (when there was such a thing). I know there are a lot of arguments against linking of GMRS. I would be most interested in the Boards’ s position on support of GMRS. ![]() Understand your early-adopters will admire you… then the rest of the general public happens… Not judging, but in PR/marketing terms, I don’t think that welcomes, encourages the general public to get in touch… but rather distance and avoid at all cost. No one needed or avoided asking you anything specifically but understanding the recent appearance of incidental GMRS traffic broadcasting one of my repeater systems/node and revelation of a new specific ‘feature’ of HamVOIP, etc.Ĭertainly, I hope, you can respect the concern some may have of to most of us un-announced and undocumented provisions of HamVOIP ‘features’/experiments leveraging the guise of AllStar.Īs to respectful discourse… your tactful/strategic generous application of f-bombs/vulgarity amid your recent anti-ham Facebook video so noted. We are ALL under scrutiny at various levels of “pure RF” vs “radio via ‘Skype’” etc. Jason, there is just coincidence between what may be local inappropriateness/mis-configuration and your unveiling of your efforts. To unsubscribe from these emails, click here. What we need to know is, were they connected on monitor only or on duplex? And if on monitor only is it legal for a ham radio signal to be sent on gmrs? We already know that the inverse is illegal. Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond. I am curious what node numbers the GMRS traffic was coming from, so I can keep a lookout for this as well? As far as I know, GMRS users have developed and maintain their own lookup system using downloaded rpt_extnode style nodelists, not DNS. On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 11:27:40 PM PDT, David McGough via AllStarLink Discussion Groups wrote:Īny kind of linking between GMRS and Amateur radio is expressly forbidden by the FCC and not supported or condoned by the HamVoIP project. Unfortunately neither party who heard the situation were in a position to check the bubble map or any of the 4+ nodes that could have been used nor heard any connect/disconnect telemetry on the 1-2 repeaters they were using. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |